Rh Negative Blood Origins and DNA Mutation

The origins of Rh negative blood are unknown and believed to be caused by some sort of mutation that occurred many thousands of years ago.

As indicated in other of my posts to this blog, I’ve considered the possibility that the human was created by extraterrestrial intervention, and have linked that intervention with the plural pronouns used in Genesis “let us make man in our image, after our likeness…” I’ve also discussed the possibility that the extraterrestrial “god” of the Old Testament is not the same extraterrestrial “god the father” in the New Testament. Is it possible that the original humans created by the OT god, those original humans who have Rh-positive blood, have been altered by extraterrestrials affiliated with the NT god, resulting in mutation of DNA and deletion of the Rh factor…producing Rh negative blood?

Following is a passage from the sequel I’m currently working on to my novel “In Our Image”. This is all conjecture, but it is an interesting concept and I thought I’d share it:

“I have a question,” I said. “In Luke’s gospel he goes through a genealogy backward in time listing who begat whom. He ends with ‘…the son of Seth, the son of Adam, the son of God.’ That says to me that Adam was the son of God, and if you are the son of someone, then you would have their DNA. The ‘god’ that is supposedly the father of Adam is the god of the Old Testament, Yahweh, who was an extraterrestrial. So if all that is true, wouldn’t Adam and all his descendants have Rh negative blood?”

“Yes, Adam and his descendants had the DNA of the creator god, Yahweh. The first humans were apes that had been genetically altered with extraterrestrial DNA. That is where the Rh positive factor originated in humans, from monkeys/apes used in the creation process. However, Yahweh’s DNA did not alter the Rh factor. An individual’s DNA can change over time. The benevolent extraterrestrials’ DNA has mutated over millennia to an extremely advanced level. They have on average 8 strands of DNA and use 50% of it. The human has 2 strands and uses approximately 5% of it. Yahweh had considerable fewer strands than 8; I’ve heard somewhere between 3 and 4. He wanted to be worshipped and obeyed by the humans he created, so he only gave them 2 strands with minimal activation of even that paltry amount of DNA. When the more spiritually evolved benevolent extraterrestrials join in the creation process with humans, the DNA mutates to a higher level and one of the changes that occurs is the elimination of the Rh factor. These humans have Rh negative blood. Jesus was Rh negative.”

I’ve read of some people who say their blood type has changed from Rh positive to Rh negative. If this is true, could it be the result of alien abduction experiments? And are the alien hybrids being born on Earth today Rh negative? Has the percentage of people with Rh negative blood remained constant since it was discovered in the late 1940′s or has it changed? I’m sure Rh negative blood is being closely tracked and someone/group has the answers.

Possible Origins of Rh Negative Blood

In the preceding post I speculated on the beings created in Genesis Chapter 1 as well as Adam and Eve who were created in Chapter 2. An entity named "God" created the Chapter 1 beings and someone identified as "Lord God" created Adam and Eve. Were these two separate creation stories and were the creators two separate groups of extraterrestrial entities? Were the first creations still on earth when Adam and Eve were created? Did they interbreed? And are pure strains of the first creations still on this planet?

The Nephilim are introduced in Genesis, Chapter 6:

“When men began to increase on earth and daughters were born to them, the divine beings saw how beautiful the daughters of men were and took wives from among those that pleased them…It was then, and later too, that the Nephilim appeared on earth – when the divine beings cohabited with the daughters of men, who bore them offspring. They were the heroes of old, the men of renown.”

So at this point, we have three possibilities for the introduction of Rh negative blood: The beings created in Chapter 1 who apparently did not have the DNA of their creator, Adam and Eve in Chapter 2 who did have the DNA of their creator, and the progeny of the Nephilim as described in Chapter 6.

Elsewhere in the Old Testament there are impregnations of various women by an entity now identified as "the Lord" who might conceivably be yet another ET strain. Chapter 21 states “And the Lord visited Sarah as he had said, and the Lord did unto Sarah as he had spoken. For Sarah conceived, and bare Abraham a son in his old age..." Other Old Testament extraterrestrial impregnations involved Rachel gaving birth to Joseph and Samson and Samuel were both born to barren women. Could Rh negative blood been introduced during these Old Testament impregnations?

Then there are the New Testament impregnations. It is possible, and in my opinion most likely, that the ET divine being of the New Testament is not the same entity/entities as described in the Old Testament. Anna was impregnated by the New Testatment god, resulting in Mary's birth. Elizabeth was impregnated, resulting in John the Baptist's birth. Mary was impregnated resulting in Jesus' birth. Jesus had a double dip of ET DNA as both he and his mother were the result of manipulation by extraterrestrials. I believe this is what made him so special. Perhaps this is where the Rh negative blood came from, the god of the New Testament?

No one knows where Rh negative blood came from; but it was not of an earthly origin, and it cannot be cloned. I wonder if the percentage of Rh negative blood (currently 15%) has stayed consistent since it was first introduced? Was there more of it or less of it at one time? So many questions...and no answers.

So What About Those Humans Who Were Created Before Adam and Eve?

As I mentioned in an earlier post, 'Back to the Bible', there are two separate creation stories in the bible: the first in Chapter 1 and the Adam and Eve creation in Chapter 2.

In Chapter 3 of his gospel, shortly after recounting the baptism of Christ (where the voice from heaven says "Thou art my beloved son; when thee I am well pleased") St. Luke provides a geneology of Jesus starting with Verse 23. It read: "Jesus...being the son (as was supposed) of Joseph, the son of Heli, the son of Matthat..." and went on and on backward in time until it got to "...the son of Seth, the son of Adam, the son of God."

Luke was saying that Adam was the son of God. I knew that Adam was created "in our image". He was created by the gods (aka extraterrestrials); but the son of God would imply that you had the DNA of the father, no?

So what about those humans who were created in Genesis Chapter 1 before Adam and Eve? I believe they were beings that were somehow created by extraterrestrials, but didn’t have extraterrestrial DNA as did Adam. Adam was the son of god, those other creatures weren’t. Because Adam and Eve ate fruit from the tree of knowledge, they knew right from wrong. Remember it says in Genesis, Chapter 2, “Behold, the man has become like one of us, knowing good and evil…”

A chilling thought occurred to me. Perhaps the beings that were created in Chapter 1 were still in existence when Adam and Eve were created in Chapter 2. Maybe those beings who were created in Chapter 1, who do not have the DNA of our creator, and who do not know the difference between good and evil, maybe they are still on our planet today.


And these beings have interbred with the progeny of Adam and Eve, diluting it further and further from what it was originally, creating a population on this earth that is no longer able to discern the difference between good and evil. Also a possibility is that there are still beings on earth today who are pure first creation offspring. They have not been tempered at all by an infusion of extraterrestrial DNA. Perhaps they are pure evil. When you hear of vile crimes and you can’t imagine what kind of person could do something like that, maybe it’s these first creation beings who don’t know any better. They don’t have souls or any spiritual essence. They live and breath, but are really just hollow shells. And when they die, that’s it. They just die.

So instead of destroying those first beings who were flawed, the extraterrestrials just conducted a second experiment with creation, this time actually using their own DNA. Adam and Eve were physically put in the Garden of Eden so they could be watched, and also be kept separate from those ‘mistakes’ made earlier. Then when they ate the apple, they were booted out of the garden, free to associate with the earlier soul-less creatures.

Did either of these groups have Rh negative blood?

Back To The Bible

As I mentioned earlier in my post entitled "In Our Image", Genesis, Chapter 1:26 intrigues me. It reads:

“And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth.”

God had created male and female “in his image”. So if God had created man in “his image” then “God” must have had a physical form and was not just a spiritual being. And if humans were created in the image of “God”, then our creator didn’t look like a stereotypical extraterrestrial with a big head and big dark eyes and grey skin. But who’s to say how many different kinds of celestial beings there are out there; each group could look different.

Genesis Chapter 2 begins with reference to God ending his work and resting on the seventh day. However, Verse 5 says“…there was not a man to till the ground.” What had happened to the man he had created in Chapter 1 whom he told to be fruitful and multiply? Reading further, Verse 7 says:

“…the Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul.”

Was this a second creation or a restatement of what was described in Chapter 1? And I saw that “God” was “God” in Chapter 1, but now a quick scan of Chapter 2 shows that this has been changed to “the Lord God”. What did this mean? Was this a different entity and a second creation story?

Chapter 2 continues with the Lord God saying “it is not good that the man should be alone.” And then, for the second time, God continued to form every beast of the field and every fowl of the air. But for the man there was not found a “help meet” for him. The creation of woman, again for the second time, follows beginning with verse 21:

“And the Lord God caused a deep sleep to fall upon Adam, and he slept: and he took one of his ribs and closed up the flesh instead thereof; and the rib, which the Lord God had taken from man, made he a woman, and brought her unto the man.”

Then the serpent shows up in Chapter 3 and we all know how that goes. I especially noted the verses that read “And the serpent said unto the woman, ‘Ye shall not surely die: For God doth know that in the day you eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil.” And once they had eaten of the tree, they did not die as God had said, but they did know they were naked.

I wondered who the serpent was. Was he ‘Satan’, or was he an emissary of an extraterrestrial community interfering with this little creation experiment for some reason? And if so, exactly what was their agenda?

I also noted that the serpent uses the word “God”; yet throughout Chapter 3 the words “Lord God” are used. “God” was the creator back in Chapter 1. Were ‘God’ and ‘Lord God’ two separate entities? Was the serpent connected with the ‘God’ of Chapter 1 and out to sabotage the ‘Lord God’ of Chapter 2?

Reading further in Chapter 3, I came across that second reference to “plural gods” when the Lord God says “Behold, the man is become as one of us, to know good and evil…”

I noted that once I got into Chapter 4, the Lord God became just “Lord” and again wondered if that had any significance. I kept reading past Noah and the flood story and came to Chapter 11 which began “And the whole earth was of one language, of one speech.” And described the building of a city and “a tower, whose top may reach unto heaven; and let us make us a name, lest we be scattered abroad upon the face of the whole earth.” And this was followed with:

“And the Lord came down to see the city and the tower, which the children of men builded. And the Lord said Behold, the people is one, and they have all one language; and this they begin to do; and now nothing will be restrained from them, which they have imagined to do. Go to, let us go down, and there confound their language, that they may not understand one another’s speech. So the Lord scattered them abroad from thence upon the face of all the earth: and they left off to build the city. Therefore is the name of it called Babel: because the Lord did there confound their language, that they may not understand one another’s speech. So the Lord scattered them abroad over the face of all the earth.”

Up through Chapter 11 there are three separate references to plural gods, and in each of them it is a direct quote of "god” speaking to others who appear to be of similar standing. And in the Babel story he is saying “let us go down”…like fire up the spaceship we’ve got to go down there and confuse the hell out of those people because they’re getting too smart for their own good.